Alexander Zverev faced a disappointing defeat in the 2024 Roland-Garros final against Carlos Alcaraz, and a controversial officiating decision at a pivotal moment has left the German star visibly frustrated.
Despite acknowledging Alcaraz’s superiority in the latter stages of the match, Zverev highlighted a specific incident that he believes significantly affected the outcome.
Read more:
- Carlos Alcaraz triumphs in epic 5-set battle to claim his first Roland-Garros title
- Game, Set, Match: Will AI outscore line judges at Roland-Garros by 2025?
A disputed call changes the game
During the beginning of the fifth set, with the score leaning in Alcaraz’s favor at 2-1, Zverev appeared to have an opportunity to break back. Alcaraz’s second serve at 15/40 was called in by the line judge but was contested by Zverev. The chair umpire inspected the mark and upheld the in-call, much to Zverev’s dismay. Meanwhile, broadcast replays showing Hawk-Eye technology indicated the ball was out by a narrow margin, suggesting that a double fault should have been called, which would have allowed Zverev to level the set at 2-2.
Tears on the clay: Coco Gauff’s emotional breakdown over tech shortcomings at Roland-Garros
Zverev’s reaction to the incident
In his post-match press conference, Zverev discussed the incident, stating, “There were moments in the fifth set where I wasn’t lucky. I heard his second serve was out on the break point at 2-1. I saw the Hawk-Eye. I would have broken back at that point, and the fifth set could have gone in a completely different direction.” He graciously conceded, however, that Alcaraz played “fantastic tennis,” particularly in the fourth and fifth sets.
The impact of officiating decisions
Zverev continued to reflect on how such moments can decisively shift the momentum in matches. “There’s a big difference between being down 3-1 and coming back to 2-2 in the fifth set. It’s decisively frustrating, but that’s how it is. Umpires make mistakes. They are human too. But of course, in a situation like that, you’d prefer if there were no mistakes,” he added, highlighting the human element in sports officiating.
Zverev not happy with the umpire in the 5th set against Alcaraz at Roland Garros.
Break point down, Carlos hits a second serve that was called out.
The umpire overrules it.
The visual on tv says it was out by 2 mm.
Tough. pic.twitter.com/cofm3Pv7A0
— The Tennis Letter (@TheTennisLetter) June 9, 2024
Broader implications for tennis
The incident has reignited discussions about the reliability of electronic officiating tools and their integration into the sport. Starting next season, electronic officiating will be implemented more broadly across the circuit, including on clay courts, potentially reducing controversies. However, as Zverev’s case illustrates, even technology like Hawk-Eye is not infallible, especially when decisions come down to millimeters.
Looking ahead
This final marks another chapter in Zverev’s ongoing quest for a Grand Slam title, often discussed as one of the best players without one. The debate over the role of technology in tennis continues, underscored by this high-stakes incident. As the sport progresses, the hope is that enhancements in technology will improve fairness and accuracy in officiating, though as seen here, no system is perfect.
Roland-Garros controversy: Ons Jabeur criticizes late night schedules and lack of women’s matches
This article explores a critical officiating error in the 2024 Roland-Garros final that Alexander Zverev believes may have cost him the championship against Carlos Alcaraz. Despite the setback, Zverev acknowledged his opponent’s skill and looks forward to future competitions, even as the tennis world ponders the evolving role of technology in the game.
